BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI

 

 

In the Matter of the Application of Southwestern Bell    )

Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Missouri, for             )

Approval of an Amendment to an Interconnection         )     File No. IK-2015-0068

Agreement Under the Telecommunications Act of        )

1996.                                                                         )

 

 

ORDER DIRECTING NOTICE, SETTING

INTERVENTION DEADLINE, AND MAKING

CINCINNATI BELL ANY DISTANCE INC. A PARTY

 

Issue Date:  September 12, 2014                     Effective Date:  September 12, 2014

 

 

This order provides notice of this application to interested parties, establishes a deadline for intervention and for requesting a hearing, and joins the other party to the interconnection agreement, Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Inc. (“Cincinnati Bell”), as a party to this proceeding.

On September 11, 2014, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, d/b/a AT&T Missouri (“AT&T Missouri”) filed an application with the Commission for approval of an amendment to its interconnection agreement with Cincinnati Bell under the provisions of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996.  AT&T Missouri states that there are no unresolved issues and that the amendment to the agreement complies with Section 252(e) of the Act in that it is consistent with the public interest, convenience and necessity, and is not discriminatory to nonparty carriers. 

Although Cincinnati Bell is a party to the agreement, it did not join in the application.  Because Cincinnati Bell is a necessary party to a full and fair adjudication of this matter, the Commission will add Cincinnati Bell as a party to this case.

The Act provides that an interconnection or resale agreement must be approved unless the state commission finds that the agreement discriminates against a telecom­munications carrier not a party to the agreement, or that implementation of the agreement is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity.[1]  Section 252(e)(4) of the Act provides that if the Commission has not approved an agree­ment within 90 days after submission, the agreement shall be deemed approved.  The Commission finds that proper persons shall be allowed 15 days from the issuance of this order to file a motion for hearing.  The Commission also finds that notice of this application shall be sent to all interexchange and local exchange telecommunications companies.

THE COMMISSION ORDERS THAT:

1.               The Commission’s Data Center shall send notice to all interexchange and local exchange telecommunications companies.

2.               Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Inc. is made a party to this case.

3.               Any party wishing to intervene or request a hearing shall do so by filing a pleading no later than September 26, 2014, with:

Morris L. Woodruff, Secretary

Missouri Public Service Commission

Post Office Box 360

Jefferson City, Missouri 65102

 

Or by using the Commission’s electronic filing and information service.

 

4.               The Staff of the Commission shall file a recommendation advising either approval or rejection of this agreement and giving the reasons therefor no later than October 14, 2014.

5.               This order shall become effective upon issuance.

 

BY THE COMMISSION

 

 

 

 

Morris L. Woodruff

Secretary

 

Morris L. Woodruff, Chief Regulatory

Law Judge, by delegation of authority

pursuant to Section 386.240, RSMo 2000.

 

Dated at Jefferson City, Missouri,

on this 12th day of September 2014.



[1] 47 U.S.C. § 252(e).