Noranda Aluminum, Inc., et al., )
)
Complainants, )
)
v. ) File
No. EC-2014-0224
)
Union Electric Company, d/b/a )
Ameren Missouri )
)
Respondent. )
Issue Date: July 30, 2014
During the course of the evidentiary hearing, Ameren Missouri offered, and the Commission admitted, exhibit 102HC and 102NP, representing the prefiled Rebuttal Testimony of Robert S. Mudge.[1] The Rebuttal Testimony of Mr. Mudge as filed in EFIS on May 9, 2014,[2] included six attached highly confidential schedules. However, those six schedules were not attached to Exhibit 102HC when it was filed in EFIS.[3]
To correct this mistake in the record, the six schedules have been added to exhibit 102HC in EFIS.
BY
THE COMMISSION
Morris L.
Woodruff
Secretary
Dated at Jefferson City, Missouri,
on this 30th day of July, 2014.
Woodruff, Chief Regulatory Law Judge