Craig Mershon,†††††††††††††††††††††††††† †††††††††††††† )
††††††††††††††††††††††††††††† Complainant. †††††††††††††† )†††††††
†††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††† )††††††† File No. EC-2013-0521
††††††††††††††††††† vs.††††††††††††††† †††††††††††††††††††††††† )
Union Electric Company, d/b/a††††††††††††††††††† )
Ameren Missouri††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††††† )
††††††††††††††††††††††††††††† Respondent.††††††††††††††† )
NOTICE OF EX PARTE CONTACT
Issue Date: †November 4, 2013
On November 4, 2013, Craig Mershon phoned me to inquire whether the Commission had received his motion that was filed earlier today.† I told him that the motion had been received.† He told me that he has mailed a second motion today that will address his concerns about disconnection notices that he has received from Ameren Missouri. He is concerned about a disconnection notice that would shut off his electricity on November 6.† He indicated he has made two payments on his account in recent days.
In encouraged him to call Ameren Missouriís attorney to determine whether the company has any current plans to disconnect his electricity.† I also conveyed the information Mr. Mershon provided to the presiding judge.††
Although the phone conversation with Mr. Mershon was primarily about procedural matters, portions of the conversation may constitute an ex parte communication regarding a pending case, as defined by Commission Rule 4 CSR 240-4.020.† This notice is given pursuant to Commission Rule 4 CSR 240-4.020(3) and (4).†
Morris L. Woodruff, Chief Regulatory
Dated at Jefferson City, Missouri,
on this 4th day of November, 2013.